Civilization Requires Compromise
Genius article — Civilization was built upon shaming women, and Feminism flipped the dynamic to shaming men.
I've never seen this dynamic stated so concisely and articulately before.
Good times create entitled mid women
Entitled mid women create bad times
Bad times create mid women who settle
Mid women settling creates good times
The Bible is absolutely true.
Husbands, love your wives.
Wives, respect your husbands.
Adultery is a sin. Fornication is a sin.
Marriage should be 1 virgin male marrying 1 virgin female...for life.
Marriage is not all about sex...there is a higher purpose, which is to reflect the pattern of Christ and His church while raising godly children.
Weird dynamic in the contemporary dating scene is that even as the sex rate plummets, so does female attractiveness. It's weird because in essence it's getting harder to find a partner, meaning partners are more expensive. To a considerable degree this is due to men removing themselves from the dating market, or simply not showing up (see: college campuses). Since this imbalance nominally corresponds to women being cheaper commodities for those still in the game, you'd think females would respond by trying to increase their SMV in order to compete, but nah, instead you get green hair, obesity, general personality bitchiness. The feminist mind parasite seems more than capable of motivating destructive female behavior in the face of market pressures. So, this continues for a while, probably.
The other thing, of course, is how many mid men just say fuck it and seek marriageable wives elsewhere? Latin America, Eastern Europe, Asia all offer good alternatives. Somewhat perversely, this could provide the sexual motivation to keep civilization ticking along, while locking white women out of the marriage market. There'd be a certain poetic justice to that.
Great article man. Also subscribed off this. Substack can be super dry and colorless. Or too memey and amateur hour. Your writing is a good balance of personal approach with jokes in the right places along with heavier insight utilizing big concepts and shit. It makes for a fun, enjoyable and thoughtful read. I genuinely hope you keep it up dude
Truly great and insightful piece. Instant subscribe from me. You were able to conjure into print a hypothesis that has been floating around in my brain for years now. Listening to my wife relay the struggles of one (of many) of her “Katie” coworkers who’s husband no longer apparently strives to advance at his job, or keep the lawn mowed satisfactorily- I often think to myself, “Well of course, why would he?, she’s gotten fat and ungrateful” I hadn’t thought it thru fully in terms of the greater social construct, but you’ve done a beautiful job at it here (even though I don’t know what an egregore is). Keep it up.
Subscribed off this. Brilliant insight into the societal trade-offs at stake. I wonder though if you think that simulated sex alternatives (prostitutes, sex robots, brothels, gigolos etc.) will be de-stigmatized (for both men and women) with the advent of sexless mid society. Part of the social pact of monogamous civilization was that these diversions were immoral because they obstructed the marriage bond. Without this holding as a unifying principle however the social values will alter to value sexual fulfillment regardless of its source. Soon we will hear that it is an act of "compassion" or "empowerment" to sexually pleasure a Katie for money just as we already hear that female sex work is "empowering." We may even see an industry of "for hire" spouses paid to live with these women for a short period. Without a culture centered on matrimony or religion do you think the old sexual taboos will break down and we'll have a sex free-for-all based on whatever gratification can be had?
most incredible article i've read in at least a year. i really need to up my IQ on these male-female sexual dynamics in the modern era in order to better understand the Big Picture. tremendous. thank you.
very good article
When I got married the last time, and I do mean the *last* time, I remember first seeing my personals date and thinking, "she's not as cute in real life as she was in her photos." But her personality hooked me, and her familiarity with outdoor activities like camping clinched the deal. I also figured her less-than-beautiful body might make her more loyal, glad to have secured a financially solid and reliable husband in spite of her shortcomings in the looks department. Boy, was I wrong. Instead it made her pathologically insecure, a classic example of what I call "jealousy disorder" where her auto-generated fantasies of my infidelity, in the absence of any evidence, became so crippling that her escape from the marriage on any pretext was her only path to mental peace. So there must be a happy medium someplace between fat & ugly making a woman hopelessly insecure, or thin & beautiful making a woman permanently in trade-up mode every time they spot a richer man.
Magnificent article. Looking forward to more. Thank you!!
I work with some Katies. It has opened my eyes to how fortunate I am to not be in their shoes. There's an element of mercilessness amongst them. I'm glad my will is strong enough.
Clever. Mechanical. Callow. I finally see that we're all just fuckseeking fleshbots. No mention of children aside from the 3 blonde androids. It takes constant, total love, devotion, intelligence, spirit etc to raise the human child even if his fucksource feels hard-done-by on the road or in the pits. The real test of our civilisation will come when all the fuck-produce, raised in broken homes and low-wage daycare factories becomes the ruling generation. We're getting a good look at many of them now. The Great Reset will be a perfect fit for them. What a lucky coincidence that it's all lined up ready to go.
How old are you by the way? Not old enough yet to realise that there is more to civilised adult life than fucking.
Interesting article. Nice to see the "unsanitized" politically incorrect observation of men. My main advice to the woman who just wanted to be a supportive wife and stay at home mom is do NOT go to college. That's the mistake I made. Went to college got a degree and a good job thinking this would somehow make me a better future wife. Problem is that when a woman begins to earn more than the cost of daycare then her husband doesn't want her to stay at home. The 50 hours that's spent at her job/commute will take away from husband, sex, kids, cleaning and cooking because a day only has 24 hours. Men if you want your wife to do more for you then support her going part time or staying home.
This is great. It's like something The Last Psychiatrist would have written if he'd had a decent editor.
Spot on, Sir!
For those that might not be familiar, I’d highly recommend checking out Kevin Samuels’ YouTube channel…
Sadly, he passed away unexpectedly in May….However, his YouTube channel lives on in infamy…….He’s literally THE Godfather of this SMV/modern woman shitshow subject and will both teach you a ton and have you pissing yourself in laughter! I cannot recommend him highly enough….!